The role of diagrams in collaborative argumentation-based learning
نویسندگان
چکیده
In this article two studies on the use of diagrams in computer-supported collaborative learning are compared. Focus is on the way argumentative diagrams can be used during collaborative learning tasks, more specifically how diagrams support argumentative interaction between students when they discuss ill-defined topics. The main goal is to discover how diagram construction before discussion, and diagram construction during discussion, influence the way students explore the space of debate during discussion. Twenty pairs of 16/ 17-year-old students were randomly selected from 126 pairs. Ten pairs worked with a diagram before discussion and ten during discussion. The research showed that students use diagrams in very different ways, ranging from a means for talking to just a notebook. Our expectation that using a diagram during discussion leads to more depth in discussion than using one before discussion, was not confirmed. Possible explanations for this finding are structure of the task, and the way students interpreted the goal of the task. r 2003 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
منابع مشابه
Building Arguments Together or Alone? Using Learning Analytics to Study the Collaborative Construction of Argument Diagrams
Research has shown that the construction of visual representations may have a positive effect on cognitive skills, including argumentation. In this paper we present a study on learning argumentation through computer-supported argument diagramming. We specifically focus on whether students, when provided with an argument-diagramming tool, create better diagrams, are more motivated, and learn mor...
متن کاملLet’s argue over it: Are argumentation skills better learned collaboratively or individually?
In this paper we present a study of the use of computers for teaching argumentation through argument diagramming. We specifically focus on whether students, when provided with an argument-diagramming tool, create better diagrams, are more motivated, and learn more when working with other students or on their own. Related research has shown that the construction of visual representations, such a...
متن کاملRepresentational Bias and Collaborative Inquiry
For a number of years, the author and his colleagues at the University of Pittsburgh’s Learning Research and Development Center (see acknowledgments) have been building, testing, and refining a diagrammatic environment intended to support secondary school children’s learning of critical inquiry skills in the context of science. The diagrams were first designed to capture scientific argumentatio...
متن کاملThe Collaborative Learning in the e-Learning Environments
Introduction: The collaborative learning and interactive electronic-learning (e- learning) is one of the key factors in education system success. This study examined the collaborative e-learning in the framework of constructivism theory. Methods: This is a review article. The databases such as Scientific Information Databases, Magiran, Science Direct, and Google Scholar were reviewed. Also,...
متن کاملComputer-supported argumentation: A review of the state of the art
Argumentation is an important skill to learn. It is valuable not only in many professional contexts, such as the law, science, politics, and business, but also in everyday life. However, not many people are good arguers. In response to this, researchers and practitioners over the past 15–20 years have developed software tools both to support and teach argumentation. Some of these tools are used...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2004